3D

February 7th, 2010 1 Comment »

Up until now I’ve been fairly unconvinced by all the hype surrounding the 3D revolution happening not only in cinemas but also in upcoming television sets destined for the home. So with that in mind, last night we went to see Avatar, the current blockbuster 3D showcase movie. Firstly, forgetting 3D for a second, the screen we visited at the Odeon in Bridgend has been converted to fully digital, which means no more film based projector. The resulting picture is crystal clear – no scratch or dust marks on the picture, no black spot in the corner for reel changes, no jump in the sound and picture when that happens… just an absolutely superb picture. Back to 3D then….. On went the glasses and the movie began. The first thing I noticed was that in this film (and also in most of the trailers beforehand), there wasn’t a huge amount of flying-in-your-face 3D effect, 3D had mostly been used to provide a depth of vision to the screen making it appear deep as opposed to jumping out at you (does that make sense?), and in fact whenever an attempt to make the screen jump out was made it was unimpressive and just painful to the eyes. However as a depth effect it was amazing and I started to see what all the fuss was about. When the camera was kept steady the 3D effects were at their most impressive and comfortable, but when there’s lots of action and movement things can get a bit blurry or worse still nausiating (I recall a dodgy scene near the beginning when soldiers jumped off a vehicle with the camera following, jumping all over the place). After a while, you even forget you are wearing the special glasses and 3D just becomes another part of the overall cinematic effect.

So in conclusion, for films in the cinema I’m totally in awe of the 3D gimmick, but I’m less convinced for the home. I guess that once a standard is agreed then I may be tempted, but until then I’m still not sure 3D is right for normal TV viewing. Oh, and the £20 for two tickets plus £8.15 for a drink, ice cream and some Minstrels puts the cinema experience in the category of expensive – It doesn’t cost too much more for a classy meal out! (and I’m not talking TGI Fridays either).


Star Trekkin' across the Odeon

June 15th, 2009 3 Comments »

I took myself to the cinema this evening to see the new Star Trek movie. Those Sith were as scary as ever, but I was a tad disappointed with the Jedi ditching their light sabres in favour of the less sophisticated phaser gun. And there were no Ewoks. All that aside I still expected Spock to point his finger at his enemies and slice the top of their heads off, but he didn’t. It was a brilliant film though and cleverly done so well worth seeing. Ooh yes and the exam I took earlier today – it went well I think and I actually enjoyed doing it which was very different to the last exam I took – hopefully I’ll get the result by the end of August.

Now cue the Trekkies’ offensive….

Poppy's First Cinema Visit

May 10th, 2009 2 Comments »

Yup, she sat through the whole film! I took her to see Madagascar 2 (aka Maggagasger) this morning and she really enjoyed herself. Tucking in to her popcorn throughout whilst pointing and laughing and the silly lions and monkeys and zebras. It was a special kids showing so there were a lot of parties around us with constant trips to the toilets, but no such problems for me cuz she (and me) held it all the way through until the end.
poppy_cinema1

Bond's back…

November 5th, 2008 No Comments »

… but I didn’t think it was as good as Casino Royale, that said it was still a good film. Pretty much just one long action sequence barely taking a breath between fight scenes. It was also quite a short one at about an hour and 40 minutes long but that meant the bag of minstrels didn’t run out.. which reminds me.. Ben and Jerry’s Chocolate Cheescake Ice Cream is the best. mmm.